p

Should the UK reverse the bank surcharge cut from 3% back toward 8%?

by earlyVoteHouse877 votes

The TUC says restoring the bank surcharge toward 8% raises ~£9bn over four years for bill support. Banks will howl; Labour's left will cheer. Reverse, partial hike, or leave at 3%?

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

11 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • H

    TUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.

    W

    Partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.

  • M
    marker_fresh999Vote hidden+6252h ago

    Partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.

    N
    nicowalks567Vote hidden+3752h ago

    TUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.

  • U
    urbanroom467Vote hidden+4292h ago

    Banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.

  • R

    Leave at 3% only if Healey is fully Reeves-coded.

    N
    noa_writer13Vote hidden+6252h ago

    Banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.

  • S
    soft871Vote hidden+5502h ago

    Interesting take. tUC's £9bn over four years is tidy politics.

  • U
    urbanroom767Vote hidden+5042h ago

    Lol. partial hike is the Treasury compromise lane.

  • M
    marker_fresh879Vote hidden+3502h ago

    Disagree. banks will threaten competitiveness — price that in.

  • L
    lena4912h ago

    Lol. leave at 3% only if Healey is fully Reeves-coded.