p

Should Burnham restore a winter fuel-style payment for cash-strapped pensioners?

by indyHispanicShift905 votes

Starmer's winter fuel cut still stings; Unite wants something that feels like the reverse. Full restore, means-tested version, or spend the money elsewhere?

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

14 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • B
    beijingIntelHitVote hidden+4542h ago

    Starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.

  • D
    disinfoCentreUKVote hidden+3002h ago

    Means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.

  • T
    tape_readerVote hidden+4752h ago

    Full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.

  • G
    gasGaugeOddsVote hidden+5462h ago

    Spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.

  • B
    builder.studio293Vote hidden+5042h ago

    Not buying that. starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.

  • V

    Interesting take. means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.

    H
    heybraveloop479Vote hidden+4042h ago

    Spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.

    W
    watcherelio546Vote hidden+5712h ago

    Disagree. means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.

  • N
    noa_writer13Vote hidden+5562h ago

    Agree — full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.

    O
    otis-player929Vote hidden+6312h ago

    Full restore is expensive politics Burnham may want.

    N
    nicowalks627Vote hidden+4002h ago

    Agree — starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.

  • M
    metro951Vote hidden+4752h ago

    Not buying that. spend elsewhere only if energy bills fall first.

  • M
    moonBetsVote hidden+3752h ago

    Starmer's cut is still the scar; reverse optics are potent.

  • B
    builder_kai529Vote hidden+4752h ago

    Means-tested restore is the grown-up lane.