p

Is hunting ghost particles at the South Pole worth big science budgets?

by neutrinoNoBrainer942 votes

This year's Nobel Prize in Physics went to Francis Halzen for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, a detector buried in Antarctic ice that caught high-energy neutrinos from deep space. It took decades and a huge international effort to pay off. Is that kind of long-shot fundamental physics worth the money, or should budgets chase faster payoffs?

Vote and see results · No sign-up required

15 comments

Vote to join the conversation.

  • H
    heyfreshmood9Vote hidden+5043h ago

    A detector a kilometre into the ice is just cool.

  • Q
    quiet-story649Vote hidden+2753h ago

    Basic research is where the big breakthroughs come from.

  • B
    builder.studio893Vote hidden+4003h ago

    Hard to sell to taxpayers, but worth it.

  • B
    bijanOverRushYdsVote hidden+3083h ago

    GPS came from 'useless' physics too.

    L
    lampwild336Vote hidden+2833h ago

    Lol. neutrinos are wild, they pass through you right now.

  • J
    junorain_461Vote hidden+5043h ago

    Congrats to the whole IceCube team.

  • N
    nicowalks747Vote hidden+3583h ago

    Fund cancer research first, honestly.

    R

    Agree — fund cancer research first, honestly.

  • C

    Neutrinos are wild, they pass through you right now.

  • S
    spare_archive173Vote hidden+4503h ago

    Fair point, but a detector a kilometre into the ice is just cool.

  • D
    demMarginBookVote hidden+3833h ago

    Sure, and basic research is where the big breakthroughs come from.

  • B
    busVsTubeDoorVote hidden+5053h ago

    Exactly. hard to sell to taxpayers, but worth it.

    H

    A detector a kilometre into the ice is just cool.